Examples
Below are short before/after examples to show what "good" looks like and what to verify.
Ministerial Brief — Example
Source: Technical report excerpt on rice stocks (summary provided by the user).
Prompt used: Agricultural policy brief synthesis (see Prompts Library).
Good output (example):
Key findings
Risks
Options
1. Release 20% of emergency reserve over 6 weeks (short-term relief).
2. Negotiate temporary import corridor with partner countries (requires MOFA engagement).
3. Fast-track procurement of 50,000 tonnes under emergency procurement rules.
Recommendation
Weak output (example):
The country has lower rice stocks than usual. Consider using reserves or talking to neighbors. Maybe buy imports.
Why the good output is better: the good output is specific, numeric, lists clear options with timelines, and includes an explicit recommendation. Verification: confirm the 4.2 months figure against source pages and ensure procurement rules allow the suggested action.
Trade Agreement — Example
Source: Excerpts from a cross-border trade agreement regarding tariffs and sanitary measures.
Prompt used: Cross-border trade agreement summary & action points.
Good output (example):
Summary
1. Agreement requires removal of tariffs on product category A within 12 months.
2. Parties must adopt common sanitary measures; country obligations include establishing inspection protocol within 6 months.
Immediate Action Items
| Action | Owner | Deadline | Notes |
|---|---:|---:|---|
| Convene inter-ministry working group | Trade Dept | 2 weeks | Include customs and health agencies |
| Draft national inspection SOPs | Health Agency | 8 weeks | Align with regional guidance |
| Notify exporters of tariff timeline | Trade Dept | 4 weeks | Provide FAQs for businesses |
Weak output (example):
The agreement changes tariffs and has some sanitary measures. You should do things to comply.
Why the good output is better: specific obligations, timelines, and owners are stated; the action table is directly actionable. Verification: cross-check article numbers cited and confirm implementation timelines with legal counsel.
Citizen-Facing Q&A — Example
Source: A citizen asks: "Why is my fertiliser subsidy application delayed?"
Prompt used: Citizen complaint triage template.
Good output (example):
Category: Service Delivery
Urgency: Medium
Actions:
- Check application upload status in the subsidy portal and confirm receipt.
- If missing documents, send templated request to user with list of required items.
- Escalate to regional office if unresolved after 5 working days.
Acknowledgement message:
"Thank you for contacting us. We have received your query about the fertiliser subsidy application and will investigate. Expect an update within 3 working days."
Weak output (example):
We will look into it. Please be patient.
Why the good output is better: it provides a clear category, urgency, concrete next steps and a professional acknowledgement message the ministry can send. Verification: ensure suggested timelines match internal SLAs and do not promise guaranteed outcomes.